With the initiation of
Educating for GNH Workshop, I really hope we get to see 'happy' or 'happier' children and teachers in school. The messages I have got from listening to speeches about revamping the school curriculum to GNH orientation make me uncomfortable. However, I'm comforted a little after listening to the Education Minister clarify on TV yesterday that the idea is to "infuse" GNH values, "not overhaul" the whole education system.
Nevertheless, we seem to have begun with certain 'assumptions' about our existing education system and curriculum - such as, the need for incorporation of GNH values - don't we already have them? Are we going to acknowledge that? Didn't we long ago incorporate values (including appreciation for and preservation of the natural environment) into the syllabi and textbooks that were designed locally? Didn't we develop values education curriculum guidelines for schools and dedicate a period to it every week? Wasn't this intended to develop morally sound citizens, who could be trusted to participate well in promoting good governance? Didn't we Bhutanize our education system with the rationale that our children would be learning more relevant content (such as, culture and forest conservation)? We might not have specified GNH as the driving force for curricular revisions in the past, but the essence was GNH. The TV announcement that the workshop participants would be looking into "what was working and what wasn't" was comforting and I sincerely hope it's true. In addition, the Education Secretary's clarification on TV (BBS) this evening that "there might already be GNH in our curriculum" was quite encouraging too.
I remember we initiated a lot of changes/reforms in education over a course of many years with the rationale that later got named GNH. Both the rationale for educational reform in the past and GNH as a developmental guiding philosophy and uniquely Bhutanese ideology came from the same source (Monarch). That's how I looked at it. Today, it appears to me that we are attempting to put the old wine into new bottles with new brand names, earning new companies universal popularity unjustifiably (idiomatically speaking). First of all, it's surprising that 'GNH in Education' has suddenly hit the headlines when we were actually already learning and living GNH values (to my thought at least). What was perhaps not certain was whether we were maximizing individual potential to live a decent life. Do our people have adequate knowledge and skills to earn their livelihood? On this evening's Educating for GNH panel on TV (BBS), there was mention of the combination of head-heart-hand-home, which was refreshing to hear but again 'old talk with new garnishing.'
I had once listened to "Improvement of the same" on the national TV channel about a year ago. It seems to make a lot of sense now, justified by the so-called all time practical realities. I remember it had further been justified that our people did not want change. If we are still going to be talking about traditional teaching methodology in a 'democratic' setting, then our strategy for not changing is already designed. Nothing more to think of, nothing much to do... complacency well bred... critical thinking a matter of the head no more...
Above all, what I personally find ironical is that we are openly admitting we are behind in our GNH implementation or actions, while some of us had been feeling proud not just of the uniqueness of the ideology but also in the belief that we were making progress. Our major indicators as some of us see them are as follows:
- Our maintenance of 70% forest coverage...
- Our well preserved unique traditional culture and its ever expanding exhibition and recognition worldwide...
- Our more than three quarters households with access to basic social facilities and services, in the promotion of equitable development....
- Our radical political changes and system of local government, in the promotion of good governance...
- Our 'peace' grown from the germination of the seeds of values sown in us during our education at home and school...
- Our almost 100% population claiming to be happy, with about half claiming to be very happy according to PHCB 2005...
But, for our nation to sustain itself it must continue to mobilize resources through internal revenue generation. It is a wonder how that is possible without a huge export potential, which two of the pillars of GNH actually provide scope for. Need I point them out...?
If there really is fear of the consequences of consumerism in the GNH Land, then I suppose we will be led into proving ourselves good practitioners by not allowing our youth to study in international schools or universities, where they are exposed to western ideas and their association with democratic ideals and principles. Unless, of course, we are certain the whole world is now going to go the GNH way... In the same spirit, I suppose it will be ensured that no single individual or group - whether rich or poor, influential or not, powerful or not, authority or not, urban or rural - has excessive access to resources at the expense of others being deprived of the minimum basic requirement. How realistic or practical is this going to be? Isn't it more likely that the poorer sections of the society will continue to remain poor in the pretext of being non materialistic and the haves will have more by virtue of their self sustaining means, however, not affecting the GNH measurement?
Deep in my heart, though, I keep wondering if our school children and teachers are going to be seen happy after the ideas from the 'Educating for GNH' Workshop are implemented in schools in repackaged forms, giving the notion that they are doing different things when they are actually doing things differently. I imagine teachers feeling demoralized once again for lack of recognition of their GNH oriented efforts. (I leave that to teachers to confirm or rule out...)
In other words, are we going to be compromising on the happiness of our schools in aspiring for something that has always been a part and parcel of our society? I wonder...
We had the same thing happening when corruption started becoming a national concern with the identification of increasing number of corrupt cases. Schools and colleges became the target for ethics education, as if we didn't already have it!